Family Law

the tree guy asked:


For over population, polution, and crime reasons should a one child per family law exist in the united states ?

Jason T asked:


This law only allows women to go out unaccompanied with a valid reason and allows women ONLY to refuse sex DURING there period.
Do you guys think it should be abolished?

EvelynR asked:


So my husband and I donated as a graduation gift and to help out. Now, he is a year out of college and we just got another letter asking donations for another sponsored trip. I think it’s an amazing thing in what he is doing but do you think a second letter/donation is a bit much two years in a row…
He has a job with the army right now and gets out two months before the trip!
This is his second mission trip…

Ron asked:


I would, because I do not believe in mass exploitation by a small minority of obscenely rich people. I guess I’m a socialist (NOT communist), even though I’m American. If we can fix the education system in our country, less Americans will be unemployed and will compete with the rest of the world; and we won’t feel the need to import more immigrants here who are more innovative than us. A lot of European countries and Canada are socialist, and they’re doing a lot better than us.

Ron asked:


I would, because I do not believe in mass exploitation by a small minority of obscenely rich people. I guess I’m a socialist (NOT communist), even though I’m American. If we can fix the education system in our country, less Americans will be unemployed and will compete with the rest of the world; and we won’t feel the need to import more immigrants here who are more innovative than us. A lot of European countries and Canada are socialist, and they’re doing a lot better than us.

theophilus asked:


For example, hiking, biking, walking…together with family ? PicNics in the summer? What is off limits…or is it a moot point?

Waffle Captain asked:


What actions did they have to commit?

-Ek asked:


Was it Scholasticism, monasticism, or manoralism?

☢♣♠♥♥☺♫♪♦ §wéétiéŘdž♫♪☺♠♥♣♥☢ asked:


Decisions reached according to Islamic law can be accepted by English family courts, it has emerged. Skip related content
Although sharia law officially has no jurisdiction in England, a ruling passed on a separating couple by a sharia council can be submitted to a formal family court.

There, the principles of the sharia judgment, embodied in a consent order, may be rubber-stamped by a judge.

The situation became clear when Justice minister Bridget Prentice told MPs: “If, in a family dispute dealing with money or children, the parties to a judgment in a sharia council wish to have this recognised by English authorities, they are at liberty to draft a consent order embodying the terms of the agreement and submit it to an English court.

“This allows English judges to scrutinise it to ensure that it complies with English legal tenets.”

A consent order can deal with the division of money, property, savings and child maintenance, according to the compactlaw.co.uk website.

The court will “rubber-stamp” the order if it decides the agreement reached is fair, and the order will then act as a contract between the couple.

If the court is not happy with the consent order it may ask for more information or for the couple to attend a hearing.

In the written answer to MPs, Ms Prentice stressed: “Any order in a family case is made or approved by a family judge applying English family law.”

But Robert Whelan, of the Civitas think tank, told the Daily Mail: “Women who live in some communities may have no option but to go to the sharia court. The case is then rubber-stamped by a family court without any of us knowing how the decision was reached.”

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20081025/tuk-family-courts-can-accept-sharia-law-6323e80.html

What are your thoughts on this?

Thank you for your replies!.
fivetoze, Because some people do not like to click on links and they can view my source of information pertaining to the question!.