How exactly does “community property” render feminists responsible for “unfair domination” of family law?
Rebel Yell asked:
It means to split any property acquired during marriage 50/50. The law These laws were created to attempt fairness to those who financially earned a property and to those who maintained the property. ALL LAWS IN ALL AREAS CONTAIN LOOPHOLES FOR THE WRETCHED TO TAKE ADVANTAGE
This entry was posted
on Monday, August 10th, 2009 at 12:00 am and is filed under Gender & Women's Studies.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
It means to split any property acquired during marriage 50/50. The law These laws were created to attempt fairness to those who financially earned a property and to those who maintained the property. ALL LAWS IN ALL AREAS CONTAIN LOOPHOLES FOR THE WRETCHED TO TAKE ADVANTAGE
Rich people pay others to do all that (maintenance)……so why are FEMINISTS blamed for all the crapola that happens in family law?
Kris. you speak mostly of wealthy couples and gold digging whores. WHAT ABOUT THE MAJORITY?! Millions of housewives still exsist and still deserve what ever effort they put into a home…no matter who actually paid for it. .
.
.How do a few laws ensure justice for all?
August 10th, 2009 at 10:40 am
Once a couple has decided to split up, if they don’t manage to sort things out amicably it becomes a field day for lawyers and the blame is tossed around like confetti. People who want to blame feminists for an outcome they don’t like will also probably be blaming feminists for a lot of other things.
Going to court is a last resort for good reasons
August 10th, 2009 at 9:06 pm
because feminism is a powerful lobby group and it uses taxpayers money to create inequalities in family, abuse, rape, education and employment law. Feminism is about getting the best deal for women, men and children don’t come into it.
Men who experience divorce law are x6 more likely to commit suicide than the rest of the population.
August 13th, 2009 at 5:02 am
Because feminist’s lobbied for those laws and much much more. And actually your doing everyone a disservice.
Under 50/50 a man could own a home for 50 years get married for 1 year and put up new wallpaper,get divorced and his ex could still claim 50%.
Under 50/50 a man could marry a wealthy executive start his own business(doesn’t even make as much as she does in a year) and his ex could still get 50%.
Those law’s were originally created to protect house wives from husbands who divorce them for the young secretary(before women started to work) but yet oddly enough those hollywood scenarios are far from average…
Men’s property rights are akin to those suffered by women during the victorian era.
Feminist’s are blamed because there the ones who altered the system even further, there the ones who advocates for those law’s.
If you want to own something get a job. The person who files for divorce shouldn’t be able to claim something they didn’t pay for.
All it is , is theft. It wasn’t right in the 1800’s and it isn’t right in 2009.
And when everything is said and done men lose anywhere from 50%(if there really really lucky) to as much as everything.
——
So the guy that spends 55-80+ hours a week deserves to be homeless? Because that’s what happens the vast majority of the time.
All your doing is justifying the theft of property for the benefit of women.
It happens way to often, wife files for divorce, lies to get a PFA then gets sole custody and the Judge signs the house over to her forcing the husband to continue to pay for a home he isn’t living in anymore while the drug addict boyfriend moves in.
But hey I suppose slavery is OK as long as it benefits women.
If men lose everything in divorce while women keep everything that is 50-50?
Why is it when ever men do anything or have anything (even our lives) everyone else tries to lay claim to it.
If you want to own your own home get a job and pay for it yourself. If you want to keep a home someone else paid for don’t get divorced.
You can say all day long “it is only the rich” but everyday thousands of men are financially raped.
Culturally men on average tie our mental well being into what we earned through hard work and commitment.
The court system and feminist enable vindictive ex’s who have a “even though I don’t want him anymore I still want to ruin him” mentality.
But it doesn’t matter. We(men) will just learn from our foremothers and foreaunts from a time period when women lost there property rights in marriage.
We simply wont get married.
August 15th, 2009 at 9:56 am
Heather Mills got $50Million from Paul McCartney after 5 years or so of marriage, yet all his wealth was earned BEFORE they met. How is this remotely fair?
August 16th, 2009 at 5:51 am
Because it were feminist lobby groups who pushed for those kind of laws. But you know what, the real damage had only the first generation of men affected by those laws.
I am not forced to marry and if cohabitation laws come to my country Australia style, I am not forced to cohabit either. Women do not want to be alone anymore than men want to be alone in the end women must settle for whatever men offer. Rising cohabitation and out of wedlock births are a testament to it.
Also you can see what family is honorable and what family is not. If you meet the parents you instantly know if she is marriage material, or chuck material.
August 16th, 2009 at 2:14 pm
I believe according to MRA’s, not only is feminism responsible for all decisions made in family law, which was totally fair before feminism (custody was then awarded to men in the US); but feminism is also responsible for:
divorce: it never occurred until feminism appeared, though my grandmother and grandfather divorced in the US in the 1940’s..
battering:no man ever hit a women or vice versa until feminism
abortion: no unwanted pregnancies occurred before feminism, every child was a wanted child and we’ve never had women die from botched abortions
equal pay: women and men have always been paid equally, and the EEOC is just making a big deal out of 28,000+ gender discrimination law suits per year
sexual harassment: 13,000+ sexual harassment law suits filed with the EEOC each year is just because of feminists, sexual harassment didn’t occur until feminism appeared
pregnancy discrimination: 6000+ women per year aren’t discriminated against because they could become or because they are pregnant, they just felt like filing EEOC claims for the heck of it last year